ASUS Radeon R7 265 DirectCU II vs GIGABYTE Radeon R7 265 OC (GV-R7265WF2OC-2GD)

Theoretical performance comparison

Real-world game, 3D graphics and compute performance is dependent on several GPU parameters, including texture fillrate, pixel fillrate, memory bandwidth, single- and double-precision performance. Below we explain why these characteristics are important and which card has better specs.

Pixel fill rate (gigapixels/s)

40
32
24
16
8
0
 
 
29.6
 
33.2
 
 
Higher is better
There are two factors that influence the maximum pixel fillrate. They are the number of ROPs and graphics frequency. The Radeon R7 265 OC has an edge in this area, as it operates at higher rate, and both GPUs have the same number of Raster Operations Pipelines. Better pixel fill rate allows more pixels to be drawn on screen per second, which results in increased performance, unless the graphics card is limited by something else, such as texture mapping or memory bandwidth.
  - ASUS Radeon R7 265 DirectCU II
  - GIGABYTE Radeon R7 265 OC

Texture fill rate (gigatexels/s)

80
64
48
32
16
0
 
 
59.2
 
66.3
 
 
Higher is better
Pixel fill rate was a critical factor years ago, but not so much these days. Texture fill rate has more significance in modern games. This parameter is proportional to the number of TMUs and graphics clock. The GIGABYTE Radeon R7 265 OC has a small advantage here, because it runs at higher frequency, and both cards have identical number of Texture Mapping Units. Better texture fill rate allows the graphics card to utilize more sophisticated 3D effects and/or apply more textures to each textured picture element, which improves visual appearance of games and generated images.

Single Precision performance (GFLOPS)

3000
2400
1800
1200
600
0
 
 
1894
 
2122
 
 
Higher is better
Maximum Single Precision performance indicates how many single-precision floating point operations the GPU can execute per second. The performance is measured in billions of Floating Point Operations Per Second, or GFLOPS. As a rule, the faster stream processors or CUDA cores operate at, and the more cores / processors the graphics unit has, the higher Single Precision performance will be. The Radeon R7 265 OC graphics card is faster here. Higher single-precision performance number means the GPU will perform better in general computing applications. Since CUDA cores or stream processors are also used as vertex and geometry shaders for 3D image generation, higher performance is also beneficial to games.

Double Precision performance (GFLOPS)

200
160
120
80
40
0
 
 
118
 
133
 
 
Higher is better
Maximum Double Precision performance is similar to the Single Precision performance, except that it applies to double-precision (64-bit) floating point operations. This characteristic is irrelevant to games performance because games do not use double-precision arithmetics. The GIGABYTE Radeon R7 265 OC graphics card has an upper hand here.
  - ASUS Radeon R7 265 DirectCU II
  - GIGABYTE Radeon R7 265 OC

Memory bandwidth (GB/s)

200
160
120
80
40
0
 
 
179
 
179
 
 
Higher is better
Memory bandwidth of both GPUs is identical.

Specs comparison

All rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

General information

Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerASUSGIGABYTE
ModelRadeon R7 265 DirectCU IIRadeon R7 265 OC
Part numberR7265-DC2-2GD5GV-R7265WF2OC-2GD
Based onAMD Radeon R7 265

Architecture / Interface

Die name 
Architecture 
Fabrication process 
Bus interface 

Cores / shaders

Compute units 
Color ROPs 
Stream processors 
Pixel fill rate  
Texture units 
Texture fill rate  
Single Precision performance  
Double Precision performance  

Clocks / Memory

Graphics clock900 MHz1008 MHz
Boost clock  
Memory size2048 MB
Memory typeGDDR5
Memory clock 
Memory interface width 
Memory bandwidth 

Other features

Maximum crossfire options 
Maximum power 

Better values / features are marked with green color, and worse values are in red color.


Detailed specifications:

Compare graphics cards

Type in full or partial GPU manufacturer, model name and/or part number.

More comparisons